How simple eLearning project structure sets you up for success
“Keep it simple, stupid” is a phrase everyone knows, but actually applying it to our work isn’t always straightforward. In this article, we explore the how and why of simple eLearning project structures and discover that simplicity isn’t the death of ambition.
It’s human nature to overcomplicate things. So it is with our approach to eLearning project structure—where less is definitely more. But why is that the case, and what is the right level of ‘less’?
What makes an eLearning project structure too complex?
We believe that course creators don’t set out with the intention of making their eLearning projects needlessly complicated. After all, we understand the general principle that simple is better.
Instead, the problem is more about recognizing how unintentional complexity happens and preventing it. In eLearning authoring, some things that increase project complexity include:
- Complex use of advanced authoring options
- Unnecessarily using complex asset types, especially those with high interactivity
- Letting courses accumulate too many pages, branches
Sometimes the root of the problem is technology rather than design. For example, your hosting/distribution solution can force you to find inelegant workarounds when the most obvious and simple methods aren’t available to you. If your LMS doesn’t allow for small courses to be linked together, you may be tempted to build a single, inefficient, monolithic course to contain everything. This can quickly become too difficult to manage.
Fundamentally, you have to make a conscious effort to use your authoring tool’s features sparingly. They can be remarkably effective but if you get too carried away, you risk fatiguing or confusing your learners. Think about the learner journey—what’s appropriate and where it’s appropriate. Don’t just use something because it looks fancy.
Your platform choices can help keep things simple. Find out more:‘2 key reasons your eLearning authoring tool needs to enable instant content updates’
The benefits of a simple project structure
Simple designs are easier for everyone to understand. The following list covers some key reasons why this is true of course design:
- Use advanced options wisely:
- You should avoid building processes that are more complex than they need to be. Anything beyond Topic A leading to Topic B, leading to Topic C adds complexity for the learner but also complicates your test strategy.
- Complex combinations of variables and display conditions make maintenance harder. If you or another learning designer return to a complex course, it can be more difficult to determine how and why logic is set up a certain way.
- Using complex/high interactivity assets only when appropriate helps by:
- Reducing clicks, which when overused can be fatiguing for learners.
- Prioritizing transfer of knowledge—what you want to teach is presented in the most immediate and engaging way.
- Covering fewer topics means courses that take less time to export, and less time to upload (and update, if you are relying on large SCORM uploads rather than another solution, such as our Gomo LMS Wrapper).
- Building simple screens leads to fewer edits to copy/pasted elements when reusing content—there will be fewer links to other screens and variables to edit.
- Control the complexity that you can. Some forms of course complexity aren’t optional: for example, if you need to deliver training in multiple languages. The import/export impact (and translation cost!) of every unnecessarily complex element you build will be multiplied by the number of languages you have.
When it comes to multilingual projects, planning ahead is essential. Learn more:‘4 planning tips for creating culturally-aware global eLearning’
What does a simple eLearning project structure look like?
We’ve established that there are benefits to having a simple project structure but what does that structure actually look like? We recommend following these principles:
- Have as few pages as possible. Without overloading pages with too much information, try to minimize the number of pages you use. Your user is going to switch off if they have to click through too many things.
- Cover only a few topics per course. Our first instinct may be to make a resource as comprehensive as possible, but this goes against the widely-acknowledged effectiveness of smaller learning resources.
- Keep your pages succinct: Don’t bombard a page with assets—your learners will get lost and lose focus on the content. The majority of single screens should contain no more than:
- One interaction type
- Aim to use a maximum of five asset types per project: Use a wider variety across all of your eLearning, but keep to basic asset types for most screens. More complex types should be used only where they are most effective.
- Include clear instruction text: Don’t leave users to wonder about what to do next. Include short, clear statements such as ‘Once you have answered this question, click next’.
- Simplify navigation: The user journey should be as simple and linear as possible. Use minimal interlinking between projects—i.e. only where it’s essential for learner understanding.
Don’t forget: proper planning underpins all these points. You’re more likely to arrive at fewer pages, fewer topics, tighter content and simpler navigation if you set out exactly what you want to achieve and the most appropriate assets to do so before you begin. When you construct your courses in a more ad-hoc fashion, you’re going to end up duplicating the same functionality in different ways.
Discover the power of microlearning and succinct content in action: Read‘eLearning during a pandemic. Embracing the benefits of microlearning’
Simple learning projects don’t require simple toolsets
What this doesn’t mean is that you only need the simplest possible toolset to succeed. If 90% of a plumber’s job could be done with a single set of wrenches, they would still need to load up their van with all manner of cutting, cleaning, and other tools for the other 10% of jobs.
Some level of variety in your eLearning assets is needed because:
- Learners are just as likely to get fatigued encountering 20 of the same screen type as they are to be fatigued by interacting with 20 different screen types.
- Simple text and image layouts aren’t the most efficient way of teaching or reinforcing certain concepts.
The important thing is to have a view across all of your content. Having the ability to occasionally drop a more unusual asset in for a key message makes it less likely that learners will get complacent about your learning programs. You need to find a balance between simplicity and variety. Lean towards the former, with certain assets kept in reserve for when they’re most effective.
In a similar vein, we’re not saying that you should never use more complex display conditions to gate-off certain content or support more than simple ‘yes/no’ question types. We merely advise that you need to have a strong reason for using them. Always question whether there are simpler ways to structure eLearning projects, or if the nuanced feedback/data you’re hoping to create by using these features has a practical application.
Gomo is an eLearning authoring tool that allows you to create learning that is exactly as complex as it needs to be (while still remaining ambitious!) Check out the links at the bottom of this page and see it in action!
A version of the blog post was originally published in May 2020. It has been republished with edits reflecting the latest information and best practices.
About the author: Adam Fox
Adam Fox is Director of Engineering at PeopleFluent and has been part of the LTG group since 2014. As a member of the engineering leadership team, Adam is responsible for technical strategy as well as software and quality assurance engineering teams.
He brings to the business a wealth of experience in designing, developing, and leading teams to create innovative systems that draw on the most appropriate and cutting-edge technologies. Adam has worked across health, defence, education, and professional sectors, producing award-winning solutions for over 15 years.